Newspaper Ads from the 7 Rivers Region Classifieds from the 7 Rivers Region Jobs in the 7 Rivers Region Cars in the 7 Rivers Region Homes for Sale in the 7 Rivers Region Rental PRoperties in the 7 Rivers Region & Rivers Region Website Directory Shopping in the 7 Rivers Region
 SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > Opinion > Story

Published - Thursday, October 26, 2006

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (No comments posted.)

Marriage measure is unfair to everybody

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
You don’t have to look very far to see who could be hurt by the amendment that will be on your ballot Nov. 7. Do you have a niece or cousin, maybe a parent or grandparent, a co-worker, a neighbor, or a friend who’s not legally married? Gay marriage is already illegal in Wisconsin, and the definition of “husband and wife” has stood up to numerous court challenges in the last 30 years.

But the amendment that double bans gay marriage also says that any “legal status substantially similar to marriage” shall not be recognized, for “any unmarried individual.”

What does that mean? No one knows. Not even the Department of Justice, who was responsible for writing the information that will be in your polling place on Nov. 7, knows what this means. The official explanation is that it “would be left to further legislative or judicial determination.”

Now think of your family member, friend, co-worker and ask yourself if it’s reasonable that their legal rights should be left to “further legislative or judicial determination.” Should they have to fight in court for health-care decision making rights, inheritance rights or to have their wills recognized?

Amendment proponents continue to try and say that this is a scare tactic (while they themselves try to tell people that polygamy and people living in wedded bliss with animals are next on the agenda), but we need only look at other states to see what’s already happened.

Visit www.BeFairVoteNo.com to read about the people who’ve lost their health insurance and who’ve lost domestic abuse protections, and see how this could hurt Wisconsin citizens. Then join with three former governors of Wisconsin, 19 past presidents of the Wisconsin Bar Association, the Wisconsin Medical Society, the UW Regents, numerous religious organizations and clergy and the Wisconsin Coalition of Aging Groups who believe that that Constitution is about protecting rights, not taking them away. Vote “No” on Nov. 7.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Onalaska Life.

 Post a comment »

(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Onalaska Life. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.
 
 

NEWSPAPER ADS