Newspaper Ads from the 7 Rivers Region Classifieds from the 7 Rivers Region Jobs in the 7 Rivers Region Cars in the 7 Rivers Region Homes for Sale in the 7 Rivers Region Rental PRoperties in the 7 Rivers Region & Rivers Region Website Directory Shopping in the 7 Rivers Region
 SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > Election > Story

Published - Wednesday, April 02, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (7 comment(s))

Onalaska Town Board questionnaire

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
Onalaska Town Board member Frank Fogel faces an electoral challange from political newcomer Howard Kelly on the April 1 ballot.

The other town board seat up for election belongs to Jeff Henessee, who was appointed to fill the seat vacated when Stan Hauser won last year’s election for town chairman. Henessee is unopposed.

To help voters get to know the candidates in contested races, this newspaper sent out questionnaires to the candidates. Fogel did not return a response, but here are the answers from Kelly:

Why do you want to serve on the Onalaska Town Board?

  • KELLY: I moved to this community just three years ago and have really grown to like it a lot. By serving on the board, I feel that I can contribute positively to the community and make an impact on the quality of life residents in the town enjoy.

    I believe that my fresh perspective on the town will be beneficial to the current board as new and forward-thinking programs are incorporated into the community and their experience will help me get a solid base of understanding in how the town functions.

    Additionally, if elected my yearly pay will be directly donated to Riverfront Inc., a charitable organization that works with disabled adults, since I view serving the town as a duty each resident should assume at some point while they live in the community.

    What personal qualities and experiences make you a well qualified candidate for the job?

  • KELLY: I am by nature an inquisitive person. I have no qualms asking questions to get an answer so I can learn about something. This will be of great use if I am placed in a position of responsibility where my decisions can affect others.

    In regards to experience, I have run a number of multi-million-dollar businesses in the past and served as the editor of a magazine that was circulated worldwide. In order to be an effective business or editorial leader, I had to learn how to listen to those who knew something better than me so that I could in turn make a sound decision to benefit the company I worked for. The same theory has to apply to being a town board member — learn from those with greater experience and use it to act responsibly.

    What are the three most important issues facing the Onalaska Town Board and what would your approach to dealing with those issues be?

  • KELLY: The three most important issues include:

    1. The comprehensive plan and its implementation. Having lived in two large cities — Philadelphia and Anaheim, Calif. — I have seen what poor planning does to a community. When a business district pops up across the street from a line of single-family homes, it really destroys the area quickly. Quality of life for the people who border the business suffer, and give up privacy and comfort to strangers on their property.

    2. Maintaining a reasonable tax levy for residents. Growth of the community must be slow and steady. Rampant change costs the community money in an attempt to keep up with required services to support the infrastructure. The town of Onalaska needs growth, but it needs it following a plan that assures everyone a good quality of life.

    3. Assuring the continued character of the town of Onalaska. The town has a rural feel that embodies the sense of community and friendship. Too much change too quickly will erode that and replace it with less than friendly neighbors.

    The community has three distinct charms that make living here seem right. First and foremost, the farming community adds a tremendous amount to the character of the town.

    Second, Lake Onalaska and the surrounding area is a sportsman’s paradise — there never seems to be an end of things you can do outside, thanks to the well-thought-out design of the community.

    Third and finally, the pride of residence in this area. Community members that live in our community are proud to say they live here and look no further than the June canoe and bike race and the support it gets from the residents. Look at the various committees that used to be in place with the past board and how many people were involved in the community and supporting it. These are the reasons to preserve our town and make people wish they could live here.

    What approach should the town board take in considering proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan?

  • KELLY: Education, education, education. Currently, and for the foreseeable future, no one on the town board is a professional land manager. Knowing what the right path of action can only come from an educated expert in field, using the town’s resources to tap into the knowledge base provided by the state and from consultants familiar with our area to educate the existing board is the only way to go. Once the board knows the potential ups and downs a decision can cause, then they can make a choice that is best for the community, not just one particular land owner.

    Do you think any changes are needed in how the town is run?

  • KELLY: Absolutely. We have a town administrator that needs to be empowered to make decisions. He is trained in being an administrator, was hired for his qualifications, and as such, has a better understanding of certain legalities than the board.

    Additionally, we cannot allow the citizens of this community to continue to feel neglected and ignored. When a resident takes the time to ask a question, it must be answered. There is always the possibility a question cannot be answered at the time it is asked, but there is no reason why an answer cannot be provided in a timely fashion.

    The health of our community is dependent on residential participation in elections, at town meetings and volunteerism. If the residents do not feel part of the community, then their participation will be nonexistent.

    MEET THE CANDIDATE



    Howard Kelly

  • AGE: 45

  • NUMBER OF YEARS IN THE COMMUNITY: Three years plus

  • FAMILY: Wife Marcia

  • EDUCATION: George Washington High School, Philadelphia; Penn State University two-year program

  • OCCUPATION: Media and advertising supervisor, S&S Cycle Inc., La Crosse

  • ELECTED OFFICES HELD: None

  • COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND MEMBERSHIPS: Oktoberfest Board of Directors, cystic fibrosis golf tournament planning board, planning committee member for Roaring Ride to benefit Family & Children’s Center, Riverfront volunteer and Coulee Region Humane Society volunteer
    .
  •    Advertisement   
     Tell us what you think...

     Comments »

    Howard Kelly wrote on Mar 25, 2008 11:51 AM:

    " I thank you all for the support and kind words. If you do think I am the best candidate for the position, please tell a friend--or two. And ask them to do the same. There are currently a lot of issues in front of the board and I want the opportunity to put the best effort possible in making some positive contributions.
    Thanks again
    Howard "

    Not only Mr. Fogel wrote on Mar 24, 2008 11:44 AM:

    " Not only did Mr. Fogel chose not to answer straight forward question for the benefit of residents, James Kinsman (Running for County Supervisor District 26, partially in the Town) also chose not to answer any questions. Why would anyone vote for Frank Fogel or James Kinsman? If they lack respect for residents now, what would they do if they were in office? "

    No response by Mr. Fogel? wrote on Mar 24, 2008 9:36 AM:

    " There is absolutely no excuse for this lack of responsibility. The newspaper offers the courtesy of a question and answer format so residents may learn candidates opinion and Mr. Fogel does not respond? This clearly reveals to residents who NOT to vote for. "

    Yet another poor choice by Stan Hauser wrote on Mar 24, 2008 8:45 AM:

    " Stan Hauser campaigning and putting up signs for Fogel and Hennesy? Very poor choice by current chairman Hauser. But when has ethics been a strong topic of Mr. Hauser? "

    Kelly against the whole board? wrote on Mar 22, 2008 4:47 PM:

    " While driving around Brice today, I saw Town Chairman Stan Houser putting up signes supporting Frank Fogel and Jeff hennessey. That doesn't seem right to me. Shouldn't the Town Chairman be in support of whomever the voters elect to be part of his team. To me it looks like it is Kelly against the whole board, not Kelly againts Fogel in this election "

    Howard Kelly wrote on Mar 21, 2008 8:03 AM:

    " Thank you for the support. I can only hope the community offers me a vote of confidence and gives me a chance
    Howard "

    Howard Kelly sounds like the most reliable candidate so far. wrote on Mar 20, 2008 9:06 PM:

    " Mr. Fogel did not return a response? Very unfortunate. I would think that the courtesy of a response would require very little effort on his part. But one of the greatest criticisms of the current town board is that they provide minimal to negligible response to residents requests for information. Definitely examples of poor communication. In light of only the above, it sounds like Howard Kelly intends to actually communicate with the residents of the town. Howard Kelly has my vote. "


    The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Onalaska Life.

     Post a comment »

    (optional)
       
    Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
    About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
    Copyright © 2006 The Onalaska Life. All rights reserved.
    Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.